Last modified: 2014-02-06 17:34:27 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T60250, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
Bug 58250 - Write and implement MediaWiki RFC report bot
Write and implement MediaWiki RFC report bot
Status: NEW
Product: Wikimedia
Classification: Unclassified
General/Unknown (Other open bugs)
wmf-deployment
All All
: Lowest enhancement (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Reques...
: easy
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2013-12-10 03:04 UTC by MZMcBride
Modified: 2014-02-06 17:34 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments

Description MZMcBride 2013-12-10 03:04:37 UTC
[[mw:Requests for comment]]

Similar to the Bugzilla reporter bot, someone should write and implement a script that is capable of reporting to the wikitech-l mailing list on a weekly basis:

* new RFCs

* RFC status changes (e.g., in draft --> accepted)

This script can be written in any suitable programming language, though PHP or Python would probably be preferable.

There are lots of ways to implement this, including parsing the HTML or parsing the wikitext or doing other silly things.

The script can be hosted on Wikimedia Labs.
Comment 1 Nemo 2013-12-10 08:23:55 UTC
> You have not provided enough detail.
> What wikis should such tool target, and what are relevant links to categories.

Glossary: MediaWiki RFC = RFC about MediaWiki, happening on mediawiki.org.
Can be found at [[mw:RFC]] and use [[mw:Template:RFC]].
Comment 2 Andre Klapper 2013-12-10 14:34:32 UTC
(In reply to comment #0)
> Similar to the Bugzilla reporter bot

This might not be much of a help, but the Bugzilla reporter code is https://git.wikimedia.org/blob/operations%2Fpuppet.git/5981242269963a7b80d9115ad80420710ec3bc1d/templates%2Fmisc%2Fbugzilla_report.php and its output can be found here: http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikitech-l/2013-December/073318.html
Comment 3 Quim Gil 2013-12-10 15:08:36 UTC
I'm not sure we need this.

While Bugzilla and Gerrit have thousands of entries and frequently require some kind of quick response, the MediaWiki RFC process is based on dozens of RFCs about strategic steps that usually don't require urgent action.

New RFCs could be simply announced in wikitech-l. Most changes of status are happening in RFC meetings with minutes that also go to wikitech-l.
Comment 4 MZMcBride 2013-12-10 15:38:05 UTC
(In reply to comment #3)
> While Bugzilla and Gerrit have thousands of entries and frequently require
> some kind of quick response, the MediaWiki RFC process is based on dozens of
> RFCs about strategic steps that usually don't require urgent action.

I didn't mean to convey a sense of urgency. The bot could e-mail weekly, fortnightly, or monthly. But I do think better advertising RFCs to wikitech-l would be helpful.

> New RFCs could be simply announced in wikitech-l.

Many people (myself included) don't do this. I'm hoping automation will help.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links