Last modified: 2013-12-16 19:05:01 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T60323, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
First Last Prev Next    This bug is not in your last search results.
Bug 58323 - Visual Editor UI should display MediaWiki:Edittools
Visual Editor UI should display MediaWiki:Edittools
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 38029
Product: VisualEditor
Classification: Unclassified
Editing Tools (Other open bugs)
unspecified
All All
: Unprioritized enhancement
: ---
Assigned To: Rob Moen
:
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency tree / graph
 
Reported: 2013-12-11 11:17 UTC by William915
Modified: 2013-12-16 19:05 UTC (History)
7 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Description William915 2013-12-11 11:17:30 UTC 
For Cantonese Wikipedia, MediaWiki:edittools is quite a useful tool to insert special characters used solely in Cantonese and not in Mandarin. It would be really helpful if it is shown in the interface of VisualEditor as well. I am not sure whether other wikis have similar requests for this.
Comment 1 Andre Klapper 2013-12-11 12:52:32 UTC 
This is about https://zh-yue.wikipedia.org/wiki/MediaWiki:Edittools ?

So I enabled 即見編輯 (Visual Editor) on https://zh-yue.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:%E5%96%9C%E5%A5%BD%E8%A8%AD%E5%AE%9A#mw-prefsection-betafeatures .

But comparing VE (編輯) and classical editing (改原碼) I'd love to know *where* you would display MediaWiki:edittools because there is no textfield anymore?
Comment 2 Derk-Jan Hartman 2013-12-11 13:07:55 UTC 
This relates to bug 50296 (which implements an alternative to MediaWiki:edittools) which is fixed, but not yet deployed. And slightly to bug 38029, because the new implementation does not actually reuse those same characters.
Comment 3 James Forrester 2013-12-16 18:57:18 UTC 
I think that this should be merged into bug 38029, though there are issues there (which I'll comment on).

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 38029 ***
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
First Last Prev Next    This bug is not in your last search results.

Navigation
Links