Last modified: 2014-11-19 10:22:40 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T60716, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
Bug 58716 - css classes for different kinds of edit summaries
css classes for different kinds of edit summaries
Status: NEW
Product: MediaWiki extensions
Classification: Unclassified
WikidataRepo (Other open bugs)
master
All All
: Normal normal with 1 vote (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Wikidata bugs
u=dev c=frontend p=0
:
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2013-12-19 21:47 UTC by Lydia Pintscher
Modified: 2014-11-19 10:22 UTC (History)
8 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments

Description Lydia Pintscher 2013-12-19 21:47:17 UTC
(reported at https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Contact_the_development_team#CSS_classes_for_edit_summaries)

"If I understand right, the first part of all or most of the edit summaries for edits on items and properties are auto-generated. Is this done once per edit or on demand every time a list of recent changes, contributions etc. is built? In the latter case, I think it should not be a big deal to also add a css class dedicated for that type of edit (added/changed/removed, label/description/alias/statement/sitelink, etc. ... maybe even which language was affected). I guess it could be of benefit if a user had the chance to visualize those different types of edits in different colors, or even filter them by a little script. E.g. when patrolling recent changes for vandalism, I hardly care about edits that add sitelinks while changing a claim has a high potential of being vandalism, but chances are that I miss that edit between all those that I don't care for. So would that be possible? --YMS (talk) 13:18, 18 December 2013 (UTC)"

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links