Last modified: 2014-03-16 19:51:02 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T60852, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
Bug 58852 - Autocompletion in properties linking Commons pages
Autocompletion in properties linking Commons pages
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Product: MediaWiki extensions
Classification: Unclassified
WikidataRepo (Other open bugs)
unspecified
All All
: Normal normal (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Wikidata bugs
:
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2013-12-22 00:04 UTC by sju-w
Modified: 2014-03-16 19:51 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments

Description sju-w 2013-12-22 00:04:31 UTC
Properties linking to Commons pages (P373 Commons category, P935 Commons gallery) should use word completion when they are edited. Possibly, "Commons page" can be defined as a new datatype in properties. 

In addition, some intelligent function could scan wiki pages linked by interwikis from the item for {{commonscat}}, {{commons}} and similar templates and propose their parameters as prioritized values of the edited property.
Comment 1 sju-w 2013-12-22 13:27:17 UTC
This bug is not about commons-MEDIA datatype but about possible commons-PAGE "datatype" (linking generally to pages of other projects, not only to media files).
Comment 2 Ricordisamoa 2014-03-16 16:45:35 UTC
Technically speaking, this does not pertain to the Wikibase extension, since we use the 'string' datatype for such properties.

Perhaps we should go with a gadget.
Comment 3 Lydia Pintscher 2014-03-16 17:08:46 UTC
Ahhhh now I understand it. ThanksRicordisamoa.
In general I agree with you that this should probably (at least initially) be a gadget. I am however also hesitant to add more scripts to item pages when we're right now trying really hard to make them load faster. So I guess it'd have to be a non-default gadget. Do you agree?
Comment 4 Ricordisamoa 2014-03-16 19:51:02 UTC
Actually, every autocompletion feature has to be written in JavaScript, even if shipped with the extension.

But I was arguing that the extension _cannot_know_ if the string is used as a page title or e.g. as an authority control identifier.

A consequence of the messy Commons-Wikidata linking system.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links