Last modified: 2014-01-26 09:14:58 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T61989, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
Bug 59989 - Statements for labels (for use with gender and plural)
Statements for labels (for use with gender and plural)
Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX
Product: MediaWiki extensions
Classification: Unclassified
WikidataRepo (Other open bugs)
unspecified
All All
: Unprioritized enhancement (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Wikidata bugs
:
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2014-01-13 09:38 UTC by Gerard Meijssen
Modified: 2014-01-26 09:14 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments

Description Gerard Meijssen 2014-01-13 09:38:53 UTC
When a "human" is an actor, the correct label to be used is different depending of the "sex / gender" of the person. When it is possible to indicate labels for use with gender, it is possible to improve on the presentation of data.

Support for plural would also be worthwhile.

As you know, MediaWiki does support both gender and plural in its i18n. At some stage this functionality is needed anyway. It might as well be now because there is an application for it.
Thanks,
    GerardM
Comment 1 Gerard Meijssen 2014-01-13 15:13:44 UTC
This is just one use-case ... one that has an immediate application. There are others like indicating deprecation of names for the same organisation ...
Thanks,
    GerardM
Comment 2 Daniel Kinzler 2014-01-14 11:39:42 UTC
This kind of thin would best be done using an entity representing a linguistic object in detail, and associating it with the data item. That is, a data item could be associated with a sense of one or more lexeme as described at https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Wiktionary
Comment 3 Gerard Meijssen 2014-01-14 11:45:41 UTC
Perfection is the enemy of the good. 

This proposal as I read it does NOT tie in with the labels used in Wikidata. It is imho one of its fallacies.
Thanks,
     GerardM
Comment 4 Lydia Pintscher 2014-01-26 09:14:58 UTC
We'll not be doing that before Wiktionary integration. It would introduce too much complexity for now. Sorry.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links