Last modified: 2014-06-16 12:41:04 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T62362, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
Bug 60362 - CirrusSearch: Stopwords are not optional and are worth as much as exact matches
CirrusSearch: Stopwords are not optional and are worth as much as exact matches
Status: NEW
Product: MediaWiki extensions
Classification: Unclassified
CirrusSearch (Other open bugs)
unspecified
All All
: High normal (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
:
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2014-01-23 02:33 UTC by Nik Everett
Modified: 2014-06-16 12:41 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments

Description Nik Everett 2014-01-23 02:33:11 UTC
This will be caused by https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/108951/ which is a fix for bug 60302 and bug 54937.  This seems less bad then not finding them at all given that they are stopwords, after all, so they should be on most pages any way.
Comment 1 Nik Everett 2014-01-23 02:33:55 UTC
The fix for this unfortunately requires me to make some changes to Elasticsearch and get them landed.
Comment 2 Nik Everett 2014-02-07 19:16:54 UTC
Looks like the Elasticsearch folks were already working on it and have got it lined up for 1.1.  This one doesn't have an issue for some reason, just a pull request:  https://github.com/elasticsearch/elasticsearch/pull/5005
Comment 3 Nemo 2014-03-18 09:21:49 UTC
Is this the reason why, if I look for an exact match of a sentence (by quoting it), I'm also provided with many results which don't contain my exact sentence but instead my sentence + stopwords in the middle of it?
Comment 4 Chad H. 2014-06-03 22:11:10 UTC
We've had 1.1 for a bit now and we're looking at 1.2. Upstream issue seems closed & merged so can we consider this resolved (or possible to resolve) now?
Comment 5 Andre Klapper 2014-06-16 12:36:59 UTC
(In reply to Chad H. from comment #4)
> We've had 1.1 for a bit now and we're looking at 1.2. Upstream issue seems
> closed & merged so can we consider this resolved (or possible to resolve)
> now?

Nik: ?
Comment 6 Nik Everett 2014-06-16 12:41:04 UTC
This one takes longer to solve then just flipping a switch.  IIRC we'd have to rewrite the query parser and I'm not sure we have the energy for that right now.  I've removed the keywords but I'm sure its not the most important thing for us to be working on right now.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links