Last modified: 2014-02-04 08:59:51 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T62688, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
Bug 60688 - [TUX] Allow to use tux=0 for longer/forever
[TUX] Allow to use tux=0 for longer/forever
Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX
Product: MediaWiki extensions
Classification: Unclassified
Translate (Other open bugs)
unspecified
All All
: Lowest enhancement with 1 vote (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
:
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2014-01-31 18:36 UTC by Bohdan
Modified: 2014-02-04 08:59 UTC (History)
8 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments

Description Bohdan 2014-01-31 18:36:53 UTC
I am a user who always use tux=0 interface because of several strong reasons (such as: tux=1 is impossible to use via mobile phone, I need translation helpers without scrolling, I need edit summary, I need several units' editing open in the same time etc. etc.) but it constantly switches back to tux=1 after some time. It's annoying always add &tux=0 when you translate or proofread in a wiki you was in long ago so I want a permanent switcher of the interface in the preferences, not cookies magic.
Comment 1 Nemo 2014-01-31 19:35:35 UTC
Please remember, we are in a war on preferences: bug 52807.
As a workaround, you can change the expiry date of the cookie which the tux=0 parameter sets: just search "tux" in the cookies of your browser (ctrl+I in Firefox) and do whatever needed to edit the expiry (an add-on may be needed, e.g. https://addons.mozilla.org/it/firefox/addon/cookies-manager-plus/ ).
Comment 2 Bohdan 2014-01-31 20:02:22 UTC
(In reply to comment #1)
> Please remember, we are in a war on preferences: bug 52807.
> As a workaround, you can change the expiry date of the cookie which the tux=0
> parameter sets: just search "tux" in the cookies of your browser (ctrl+I in
> Firefox) and do whatever needed to edit the expiry (an add-on may be needed,
> e.g. https://addons.mozilla.org/it/firefox/addon/cookies-manager-plus/ ).

Problem is that I use several browsers and devices and it's absolutely impossible to manage cookies in many (I think in the majority of) mobile browsers.
Comment 3 Nemo 2014-01-31 20:10:13 UTC
(In reply to comment #2)
> it's absolutely
> impossible to manage cookies in many (I think in the majority of) mobile
> browsers.

I'm not going to investigate all browsers of all OS of the world but some managing is possible, hence I suggest to search a bit: https://addons.mozilla.org/it/android/search/?q=cookies
Comment 4 Niklas Laxström 2014-02-03 19:07:30 UTC
I'm going to mark this as WONTFIX, as we would not accept patch for this. The old UI is explicitly not supported.

Unfortunately nobody seems to working on our mobile apps currently, which could provide some help for you.
Comment 5 Bohdan 2014-02-03 19:20:40 UTC
Sorry but I insist. Why are you ignoring users' need? Why I must be not able to edit via mobile because you don't want it? TUX is ugly and very low functional in compare with tux=0 - why on Earth are you imposing tux=1? I'm not able to work in tux=0 because of things I listed in the description and it's absolutely impossible to work there via mobile. Mobile apps are not the solution because they usually are just for 2 platforms (android & ios) which I don't use.
Comment 6 Bohdan 2014-02-03 19:23:51 UTC
Shall be "I'm not able to work in tux=1 sure". I was typing fastly.
Comment 7 Nemo 2014-02-03 19:24:32 UTC
No opinion on last two comments, I'm just making the summary a bit more generic/to the point.
Comment 8 Andre Klapper 2014-02-04 08:59:51 UTC
In the end maintainers decide which patches get in, and if Niklas says that there are no human resources to support two interfaces at the same time this means de facto WONTFIX. If you would like to challenge general priorities of development teams or even of the Foundation, please feel free to do so, but this would be too high level for this bug report itself. 
Thanks for your understanding.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links