Last modified: 2014-11-03 22:41:31 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T62919, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
First Last Prev Next    This bug is not in your last search results.
Bug 60919 - VisualEditor: "Use an Existing Reference" option remains disabled for a reference inside Media Settings while there is a reference available to re-use in the page
VisualEditor: "Use an Existing Reference" option remains disabled for a refer...
Status: ASSIGNED
Product: VisualEditor
Classification: Unclassified
Editing Tools (Other open bugs)
unspecified
All All
: High normal
: ---
Assigned To: Editing team bugs – take if you're interested!
:
Depends on: ve-subdocuments
Blocks:
  Show dependency tree / graph
 
Reported: 2014-02-05 22:07 UTC by Rummana Yasmeen
Modified: 2014-11-03 22:41 UTC (History)
6 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---

Attachments
Screenshot (35.54 KB, image/png)
2014-02-05 22:07 UTC, Rummana Yasmeen 		Details
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Description Rummana Yasmeen 2014-02-05 22:07:21 UTC 
Created attachment 14497 [details]
Screenshot

Steps to reproduce:

1.Open the page with VE
2.Add a text with reference
3.Add an image
4.Go to Media Settings for the image
5.Go to Insert>Reference

Observed Result:
Observe that, the "Use an existing reference " button remains disabled even if there is a reference added in the page


See the screenshot attached

Test Environment: https://test2.wikipedia.org/
Browser: Chrome Version 26.0.1410.65 
OS: MAC OS X 10. 8. 5 
Page:https://test2.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wmf12chrome?veaction=edit
Comment 1 Ed Sanders 2014-02-05 23:59:22 UTC 
Looks like we aren't copying over the internalList object from the parent dm document.
Comment 2 Alex Monk 2014-11-01 23:08:08 UTC 
(In reply to Ed Sanders from comment #1)
> Looks like we aren't copying over the internalList object from the parent dm
> document.

Does that explain bug 58322 or bug 71214?
Comment 3 James Forrester 2014-11-03 22:41:31 UTC 
This is blocked by bug 47344, the infamous sub-documents bug.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
First Last Prev Next    This bug is not in your last search results.

Navigation
Links