Last modified: 2014-05-23 12:00:22 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T63022, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
Bug 61022 - Add ability to thank anonymous/IP users
Add ability to thank anonymous/IP users
Status: NEW
Product: MediaWiki extensions
Classification: Unclassified
Thanks (Other open bugs)
unspecified
All All
: Low enhancement with 1 vote (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
:
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2014-02-07 12:15 UTC by Dan Wolff
Modified: 2014-05-23 12:00 UTC (History)
10 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments

Description Dan Wolff 2014-02-07 12:15:10 UTC
When I look at edits that anonymous users have made, there is no link to thank them.

Some really good contributions are made by IP users and I don't see the reason for not being able to thank them for it.
Comment 1 Kunal Mehta (Legoktm) 2014-02-07 21:11:33 UTC
Long wikimedia-l thread about it (100+ posts): http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikimedia-l/2014-January/thread.html#129443

Marking bug 56828 as a blocker, though as MZMcBride pointed out (http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikimedia-l/2014-January/129587.html), this could easily be done without Echo using a talk page post.
Comment 2 James Forrester 2014-05-20 15:11:58 UTC
(In reply to Kunal Mehta (Legoktm) from comment #1)
> MZMcBride pointed out
> (http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikimedia-l/2014-January/129587.html),
> this could easily be done without Echo using a talk page post.

This would completely break the interaction model of Thanks (that it's not about the individual showing off they've been thanked). Consider this a -2 (or, indeed, stronger) in advance of any such work being done.
Comment 3 Nemo 2014-05-20 23:04:49 UTC
(In reply to Kunal Mehta (Legoktm) from comment #1)
> this could easily be done without Echo using a talk page post.

There's also no need to use Thanks extension for thanks features, we've had them for 5+ years in patrolling gadgets. See [[m:Thanks]].
Comment 4 MZMcBride 2014-05-20 23:12:38 UTC
(In reply to James Forrester from comment #2)
> This would completely break the interaction model of Thanks (that it's not
> about the individual showing off they've been thanked).

[[mw:Extension:Thanks]] doesn't seem to support what you're saying here. The purpose of the "Thanks" extension is to allow users to "thank other users for individual edits".

You seem to be putting a means above an end. Sending an Echo notification is hardly the only means of transmitting an expression of gratitude for an edit from one user to another. I'm curious what interaction model you think would be disrupted here.

> Consider this a -2 (or, indeed, stronger) in advance of any such work
> being done.

That's not really how -2 works, though you're welcome to express your thoughts and opinions on this enhancement request, of course.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links