Last modified: 2014-02-27 21:41:41 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T63777, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
Bug 61777 - VisualEditor: Make references visible for re-use when they're 'hidden' inside templates, e.g., list-defined refs in the reflist template
VisualEditor: Make references visible for re-use when they're 'hidden' insid...
Status: RESOLVED INVALID
Product: VisualEditor
Classification: Unclassified
General (Other open bugs)
unspecified
All All
: Unprioritized normal
: ---
Assigned To: James Forrester
:
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2014-02-21 21:49 UTC by WhatamIdoing
Modified: 2014-02-27 21:41 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments

Description WhatamIdoing 2014-02-21 21:49:22 UTC
This is related to Bug 57209.

List-defined references (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:LDR#WP:LDR) are listed in the {{reflist}} template rather than in the regular text of the page. References that are defined inside the {{reflist}} are not visible when you try to re-use an existing reference.

Steps to reproduce:

1. Open a page that uses list-defined references with the {{reflist}} template (rather than <references></ref>).

2. Go to Insert > Reference to add a new reference.  Click "Re-use existing reference".

3. Discover that the numbers ("[1]") and ref names are visible, but the contents are not.

This problem does not exist if the non-template method is used.  This problem also exists for refs inside blockquotes, infoboxes, and other templates.
Comment 1 James Forrester 2014-02-27 21:41:41 UTC
Not possible without re-writing the Cite extension from scratch, which is sort-of planned but won't be done before 2015 at the earliest. Marking as "INVALID", but it's mostly a "can't fix".

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links