Last modified: 2014-10-16 11:52:46 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T63984, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
Bug 61984 - Re-evaluate label of Bugzilla's "NEW" status (rename to "OPEN"?)
Re-evaluate label of Bugzilla's "NEW" status (rename to "OPEN"?)
Status: NEW
Product: Wikimedia
Classification: Unclassified
Bugzilla (Other open bugs)
wmf-deployment
All All
: Lowest normal (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
:
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2014-02-27 04:41 UTC by MZMcBride
Modified: 2014-10-16 11:52 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments

Description MZMcBride 2014-02-27 04:41:41 UTC
We have some bugs in this Bugzilla installation that are pretty old and when you load them in a Web browser, Bugzilla shouts "NEW" at you in reference to the bug report. This seems a bit strange. A bug that's several years old isn't new.

Would it make sense to rename the status to "OPEN"? Or "TICKET"? Or "ISSUE"?
Comment 1 Andre Klapper 2014-02-27 11:40:57 UTC
Related discussions on naming:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=486292 (Summary: Upstream uses "CONFIRMED" instead of "NEW" nowadays, and change "ASSIGNED" to "IN_PROGRESS")
https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/971
Comment 2 Andre Klapper 2014-08-26 20:00:11 UTC
This would break any externally saved Bugzilla query URLs (e.g. in browser bookmarks), hence unlikely to happen though I'd like to see it, plus soon to be superseded by Phabricator.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links