Last modified: 2014-04-21 20:07:01 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T65617, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
Bug 63617 - Flow: missing topic
Flow: missing topic
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: MediaWiki extensions
Classification: Unclassified
Flow (Other open bugs)
unspecified
All All
: Unprioritized normal (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
:
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2014-04-07 12:40 UTC by Matthias Mullie
Modified: 2014-04-21 20:07 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments

Description Matthias Mullie 2014-04-07 12:40:48 UTC
While looking at bug 63616, I tried limiting $wgFlowDefaultLimit and $wgFlowMaxLimit on my local machine to 1.

Topics displayed should be exactly the same, they should only load in different batches (per 10 or per 1).
Yet, I found that when loading per 1, there was a topic I could not find when loaded per 1. Conversely, when loaded per 1, there was a different topic that was not shown when loaded per 10.
Comment 1 Matthias Mullie 2014-04-07 12:48:34 UTC
On a second try (again with flushed cache), the entry missing from the list loaded per 10, was there. And there was another one missing...

It seems like we're losing topics here & there.
Comment 2 Matthias Mullie 2014-04-07 13:07:14 UTC
I've done some minor testing without cache ($wgFlowUseMemcache = false) and couldn't find any dropped posts there.

Since I coulnd't find any consistency in the posts dropped earlier, it could just be that my local # messages sample size was too small, or just dumb luck that all of them appeared to exist now; however, it's an indication that this issue may not exist without cache, and that it's related to caching (and not related to pagination, filtering out suppressed comments, ...)
Comment 3 Matthias Mullie 2014-04-07 16:40:27 UTC
https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/124342/ seems to also have solved this, after some quick initial testing. Still need to figure out why that one was causing bad cache data, though.
Comment 4 Gerrit Notification Bot 2014-04-08 17:24:33 UTC
Change 124645 had a related patch set uploaded by Matthias Mullie:
Fix DB-to-cache pipeline

https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/124645
Comment 5 Gerrit Notification Bot 2014-04-08 20:09:50 UTC
Change 124645 merged by jenkins-bot:
Fix DB-to-cache pipeline

https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/124645
Comment 6 Gerrit Notification Bot 2014-04-09 23:10:47 UTC
Change 125018 merged by jenkins-bot:
Backport fix DB-to-cache pipeline for mw.org

https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/125018

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links