Last modified: 2014-09-22 07:13:17 UTC
In graphs like those of attachment 15584 [details], which report only median, it's easy to get distracted if you don't know absolute numbers of measured points: is the green line about 3, 30 or 3000 changesets? Is it 100 times less or 100 times more than the yellow? If I don't know, I can really do nothing with the brute median. It should be easy to add number of observation points next to each label in the legend.
Just checking: is what you are asking the information provided by the popup windows when you hover over the graphs?
(In reply to Quim Gil from comment #1) > Just checking: is what you are asking the information provided by the popup > windows when you hover over the graphs? No, I mean the N, the number of values of which the median is calculated
Quim, you have now the number of reviews used for computing the age of open changesets in: http://korma.wmflabs.org/browser/gerrit_review_queue.html There are differences between reviews (waiting for reviewer) and reviews with last upload (waiting for reviewer) because the initial upload is before date analysis and last upload is not. You can also cross this numbers with the first viz (Volume of Open Changesets) Waiting for review. This green line has the same number of reviews than the blue line in Age of open changesets.
Looks good, thank you!
