Last modified: 2014-09-17 06:45:23 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T69623, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
Bug 67623 - Review and deploy PubSubHubbubExtension
Review and deploy PubSubHubbubExtension
Status: NEW
Product: Wikimedia
Classification: Unclassified
Extension setup (Other open bugs)
wmf-deployment
All All
: Normal normal (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
:
Depends on: 67117 67118 67661
Blocks: 38970
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2014-07-07 20:21 UTC by Greg Grossmeier
Modified: 2014-09-17 06:45 UTC (History)
6 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments

Description Greg Grossmeier 2014-07-07 20:21:11 UTC
== Done ==

# Create Extension: mediawiki.org page for developers and people who will install or configure the extension.
## https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:PubSubHubbub
# Get the extension code in [[Gerrit]].
## https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/admin/projects/mediawiki/extensions/PubSubHubbub
# Request (and respond to) a Design Review if applicable.
## Not applicable, I assume


== Not done/In-progress ==

# Create Help:Extension: mediawiki.org page for the end user documentation. Cross-link it with the above.
## redlink: https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Help:Extension:PubSubHubbub
# Request a component in [[Bugzilla]].
## don't see one
# Request (and respond to) a performance review
## bug 67117
# Request (and respond to) a security review
## bug 67118


== Maybe? ==

# Request (and respond to) a product review, if applicable
## Applicable?
# Show community support/desire for the extension to be deployed, if applicable.
Comment 1 Sam Reed (reedy) 2014-07-07 21:10:13 UTC
CF bug 38970

(In reply to Sam Reed (reedy) from comment #6)
> This seems to be essentially re-inventing $wgRCFeeds (and related classes
> etc). Why?





Do we need a frontend at WMF?

Also, if not, it needs proxy support to contact remote servers...

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links