Last modified: 2014-08-19 17:52:02 UTC
cswiki uses the 21. 5. 2014, 17:07 (UTC) timestamp. archivebot does not register that as valid.
Change 153338 had a related patch set uploaded by Mpaa: Bug 69315 - cs timestamp not supported https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/153338
Change 153338 merged by jenkins-bot: Bug 69315 - cs timestamp not supported https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/153338
I dont think it is resolved. Today I tried to archive through the latest core my discussion page at https://cs.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Diskuse_s_wikipedistou:Wesalius which archived it to https://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diskuse_s_wikipedistou:Wesalius/archiv_2014-1 The template says: {{Archivace |maxarchivesize = 150K |counter = 2 |minthreadsleft = 0 |minthreadstoarchive = 2 |algo = old(30d) |archive = Diskuse s wikipedistou:Wesalius/archiv 2014-2 }} The archived page does not include just 30d and older threads (the age of the archived threads occurs to me pretty random), it archives just some older and most of the younger threads then that. I cant change the status of the bug, but I am assuming it is still the same problem.
Please define 'the latest core'.
(In reply to Merlijn van Deen from comment #4) > Please define 'the latest core'. version.py gives: Pywikibot: nightly/core (6db4ab1, 3796, 2014/08/13, 14:01:12, OUTDATED) Release version: 2.0b1
OK, that's https://github.com/wikimedia/pywikibot-core/commit/6db4ab1ed6ae65940d0ef9978f0096b2cdd04712 Merge "Bug 69315 - cs timestamp not supported", so that suggests the issue indeed is still there.
Yes, it still in there. Submitting a new patch. This is only regarding the detection of the timestamp. I am not sure this will sort out also age of archived threads. I would suggest to rollback Talk page and Archive and tri to rerun the bot with the new patch.
Change 153834 had a related patch set uploaded by Mpaa: Bug 69315 - cs timestamp not supported (II) https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/153834
Change 153834 merged by jenkins-bot: Bug 69315 - cs timestamp not supported (II) https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/153834
Would be good if this patch could be checked again on cs.wiki with a real case.