Last modified: 2014-08-19 16:01:13 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T71744, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
Bug 69744 - VisualEditor: Provide content-based descriptions when focusing references or templates
VisualEditor: Provide content-based descriptions when focusing references or ...
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 69474
Product: VisualEditor
Classification: Unclassified
MediaWiki integration (Other open bugs)
unspecified
All All
: Unprioritized normal
: ---
Assigned To: Editing team bugs – take if you're interested!
:
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2014-08-19 15:49 UTC by Ed Sanders
Modified: 2014-08-19 16:01 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments

Description Ed Sanders 2014-08-19 15:49:54 UTC
In particular we've had a community request to display a citation summary when focusing citation nodes.

We could list template values in order until we run out of room, but this may not lead to desirable results, for example the first parameter in {{Cite web}} is URL.

A more complex solution would be to come up with a format for defining how to generate the summary of a template and store it in template data, either as a value on the column (summary order):

Field     Desc  Summary order
url       ...   null
publisher ...   2
title     ...   1
date      ...   3
month     ...   null

A simplified version of this would just flag one field as being used in the summary.

etc.

Or as a string concatenation message somewhere:

"{{{title}}}, {{{publisher}}} - {{{date}}}"
Comment 1 Bartosz Dziewoński 2014-08-19 15:56:21 UTC
Is this the same thing as bug 69474? (You filed that one too, and the bug numbers are confusingly similar. :D)
Comment 2 Ed Sanders 2014-08-19 16:00:25 UTC
I'm going crazy...

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 69474 ***
Comment 3 Ed Sanders 2014-08-19 16:01:13 UTC
Clearly I was protecting against typos in the bug number :)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links