Last modified: 2014-09-07 03:21:06 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T72438, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
Bug 70438 - BetaFeatures should have means to provide a custom note on-wiki
BetaFeatures should have means to provide a custom note on-wiki
Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX
Product: MediaWiki extensions
Classification: Unclassified
BetaFeatures (Other open bugs)
unspecified
All All
: Unprioritized enhancement (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
:
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2014-09-05 13:12 UTC by Gryllida
Modified: 2014-09-07 03:21 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments

Description Gryllida 2014-09-05 13:12:45 UTC
I'd like to enable a new beta feature on a wiki, but I wouldn't like the users to enable it thoughtlessly, as it currently breaks a lot of things. For this reason, I'd like to be able to append a 'do NOT use this! only for developers' note to such beta feature in the beta tab.
Comment 1 Andre Klapper 2014-09-05 13:52:20 UTC
Hmm. Does that sound like a common usecase, or rather like something that you could hack up yourself if really wanted? I don't know...
Comment 2 Kunal Mehta (Legoktm) 2014-09-05 20:20:31 UTC
Editing the MediaWiki messages isn't good enough?
Comment 3 James Forrester 2014-09-05 20:53:46 UTC
If there are severe issues that would "break a lot of things" it's not ready to be a Beta Feature and for WMF servers we wouldn't let it go live. Consequently I don't see a valid use case and am marking as WONTFIX.
Comment 4 Gryllida 2014-09-06 02:17:08 UTC
James Forrester, I expected you to be most familiar with the context here -- installation of visualeditor at non-Wikipedias as a sort-of-pre-beta feature, while people script visualeditor to suit the project needs.

If it's put as a beta feature, a lot of people will enable it and make edits that break things or at least don't provide the relevant features (for wikipedias, this is the common use of <ref> tag, for instance; for its sisters, it's a need in other toolbar buttons and often lack of need in <ref> tag in the first place).
Comment 5 James Forrester 2014-09-07 03:21:06 UTC
(In reply to Gryllida from comment #4)
> James Forrester, I expected you to be most familiar with the context here --
> installation of visualeditor at non-Wikipedias as a sort-of-pre-beta
> feature, while people script visualeditor to suit the project needs.

This is the very first time you've suggested it, so no, I'm not remotely familiar with your idea. :-)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links