Last modified: 2014-11-07 16:25:47 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T73973, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
Bug 71973 - Collaborative spelling dictionary building tool
Collaborative spelling dictionary building tool
Status: NEW
Product: MediaWiki extensions
Classification: Unclassified
Extensions requests (Other open bugs)
unspecified
All All
: Low enhancement (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
:
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2014-10-12 09:51 UTC by Quim Gil
Modified: 2014-11-07 16:25 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments

Description Quim Gil 2014-10-12 09:51:03 UTC
Posted at https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/FOSS_Outreach_Program_for_Women/Round_9#Collaborative_spelling_dictionary_building_tool

There are extensive spelling dictionaries for the major languages of the world: English, Italian, French and some others; at various degrees of coverage, Mozilla has over a hundred, LibreOffice dozens. They help make Wikipedia articles in these languages more readable and professional and provide an opportunity for participation in improving spelling. Many other languages, however, don’t have spelling dictionaries. One possible way to build good spelling dictionaries would be to employ crowdsourcing, and Wikipedia editors can be a good source for this, but this approach will also require a robust system in which language experts will be able to manage the submissions: accept, reject, filter and build new versions of the spelling dictionary upon them. This can be done as a MediaWiki extension integrated with VisualEditor, and possibly use Wikidata as a backend.
Comment 1 Ankita Shukla 2014-10-12 10:40:09 UTC
Hello everyone!

I read through this project idea and am interested in working on this. 
Presently what I understand is that the project requires an admin panel to be built such that the suggestions that come through crowdsourcing can be verified by the administrator. This panel will be ready with rights like approving, rejecting, filtering to be given to the administrator so as to ensure only valid words/spellings to be accepted.

Please correct me if I'm wrong.

Also, it would be great if I could be redirected to some bugs that might help me better understand this project.

Thanks!
Comment 2 Daniel Naber 2014-10-26 14:38:12 UTC
I'm not sure, but http://www.dicollecte.org/home.php?prj=fr might do something similar. It should probably be evaluated before starting this project.
Comment 3 Ankita Shukla 2014-10-28 19:36:27 UTC
(In reply to Daniel Naber from comment #2)
> I'm not sure, but http://www.dicollecte.org/home.php?prj=fr might do
> something similar. It should probably be evaluated before starting this
> project.

This is something very similar to what the project aims to accomplish, just that dicollecte is specific to French. The project takes this up as a challenge (that only the most popular languages have a solid base of spelling dictionaries) and aims to establish spelling dictionaries for lesser popular languages as well.
Comment 4 Quim Gil 2014-11-06 16:51:09 UTC
There is a question that as far as I can see hasn't been answered:

> How would such a thing interact with the wiktionary community. Would it
> harvest data from them or be a sub project somehow, or is it planned to be
> entirely separate?

https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikitech-l/2014-October/079022.html
Comment 5 Ankita Shukla 2014-11-07 16:25:47 UTC
(In reply to Quim Gil from comment #4)
> There is a question that as far as I can see hasn't been answered:
> 
> > How would such a thing interact with the wiktionary community. Would it
> > harvest data from them or be a sub project somehow, or is it planned to be
> > entirely separate?
> 
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikitech-l/2014-October/079022.html

In the initial phase of development, the project will aim at making a spelling dictionary for VE. Once this has been achieved, it can then be integrated into Wiktionary later on. 
This way, it won't remain totally independent of the Wiktionary community forever, rather, it shall aim at improving and increasing the span of the same.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links