Last modified: 2014-11-19 14:09:14 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T74433, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
Bug 72433 - Huggle should patrol edits when they are reverted
Huggle should patrol edits when they are reverted
Status: NEW
Product: Huggle
Classification: Unclassified
Application (Other open bugs)
unspecified
All All
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: Peter Bena
:
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2014-10-23 16:47 UTC by Helder
Modified: 2014-11-19 14:09 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments

Description Helder 2014-10-23 16:47:42 UTC
The edit
https://pt.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=40344113
was reverted using Huggle
https://pt.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=40344118
but it was not marked as patrolled. It should.

I had to patrol it manually:
https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Log/patrol?offset=20141022175434&limit=1&page=Coelho&dir=prev

See also bug 51545.
Comment 1 Peter Bena 2014-10-23 21:39:25 UTC
hmm, is that a regular rollback or software rollback? see if there is rollback / edit in history of your changes made by huggle, that little widget on side

if it's a rollback mediawiki should patrol this
Comment 2 Helder 2014-10-23 23:06:10 UTC
I don't know. But the user in question is a rollbacker (not a sysop) on ptwiki, so he has the "rollback" user right.

Even if he wasn't, and the edit was a simple reversion instead of a rollback, it should still be patrolled if the user has the "patrol" user right.
Comment 3 Helder 2014-11-13 13:28:54 UTC
(In reply to Helder from comment #2)
> I don't know. But the user in question is a rollbacker (not a sysop) on
> ptwiki, so he has the "rollback" user right.
He is now a sysop:
https://pt.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Especial%3ARegisto&type=&user=%C3%89rico+J%C3%BAnior+Wouters&page=Usu%C3%A1rio%3APauloEduardo&year=&month=-1&tagfilter=&hide_patrol_log=1&hide_review_log=1&hide_thanks_log=1
However, the problem persists with and without software rollback:
https://pt.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=40601219
https://pt.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=40601231
Comment 4 Helder 2014-11-13 13:48:24 UTC
This also happens with edits reverted by another user:
https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Especial:Registo/patrol?page=Coenzimas&uselang=en
(revision 40601251 reverted revision 40601249, but only 40601251 was patrolled automatically)
Comment 5 Peter Bena 2014-11-13 14:30:42 UTC
Yes I know it should be, but I need to figure out where the bug is so that I can fix it, that is why I wanted to know if it's a software rollback
Comment 6 Peter Bena 2014-11-13 14:32:00 UTC
ok so the problem is there for both cases? That means some extra api would need to be launched
Comment 7 Helder 2014-11-19 14:09:14 UTC
Yes, the problem happens in both rollback options.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links