Last modified: 2013-05-29 08:05:00 UTC
en.wikipedia.beta.wmflabs.org was down today. (See "wmflabs.org down?" thread[1]). It is up now, but it is pretty slow. It takes 10-20 seconds to load the home page. Petr Bena suggested I should report it as a bug. [1] http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/labs-l/2013-January/thread.html
Cannot reproduce, http://en.wikipedia.beta.wmflabs.org/ finishing loading within ~4 seconds here.
That was due to the deployment-squid instance having its cache on glusterfs. I have migrated the cache dir to /mnt and that fixed the performance issue.
I am not sure how bug lifecycle is handled. Please let me know if there is anything I should do. Should I change the status to verified? Or is setting it to resolved (as it is now) enough?
RESOLVED is usually enough. Whenever I do verify a bug is actually fixed, I mark them VERIFIED, but that is really just me :-]
(In reply to comment #3) > Should I change the status to verified? On https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Bug_management/Bug_report_life_cycle I wrote "Optionally the status VERIFIED is set if a QA tester or the reporter checked that the after the fix has been deployed." until somebody proves me wrong. :)